|
Post by किक प& on Sept 4, 2009 12:32:59 GMT -5
lies
|
|
ΩÑÇ ±Ñêÿø±
Inactive Member
NC Gentleman
Posts: 1,177
|
Post by ΩÑÇ ±Ñêÿø± on Sept 4, 2009 12:35:11 GMT -5
Dude...uh wtf is with the chick O.o?!
|
|
|
Post by Finz on Sept 4, 2009 14:26:59 GMT -5
lies Thats not curly hair, thats 10.000V hair This is Curly Asian
|
|
|
Post by Tekumotochiku on Sept 4, 2009 15:07:17 GMT -5
Deo I know ur upset cuz ur 10% black 90% asain but don't take itout on te spanish they didn't do anyting to you D: cuzz asians is gangsta i would say bomb japan but we would lose in a war against them NO BOMB KOREA AN RUSSIA BITCH
|
|
|
Post by Hunter™ on Sept 4, 2009 19:28:33 GMT -5
deo...japan...idk they'd probly match us..they're fucking crazy...korea...we kill them...we die too....we go anywhere near russia with weapons...they'll make like the japs and erase everyone off the planet.
But in that scenario, overpopulation wouldnt be an issue...well population in general wouldnt be an issue....
|
|
|
Post by किक प& on Sept 4, 2009 20:27:57 GMT -5
Does anyone remember what we did to japan last time? They wouldn't get in another war with us lol they're still shitting there pants from Hiroshima
|
|
|
Post by Decimato on Sept 4, 2009 20:32:01 GMT -5
Japan has zilch as far as the ability to match the U.S. in any sort of armed conflict. China probably can, and Russia has a shitload of land plus more nuclear weapons than us, but even those are 50-50 at best, we can nuke any country out of existance if necessary. Korea....depending on which one, could probably blow up some of Alaska or Hawaii, but they can't hit mainland U.S. soil.
As far as population goes, I'm not sure what the Earth's carrying capacity is, but I know we're around the threshold for it. However, there are several things that lead me to think that the population will likely shrink in coming years, or at least have a neutral(zero) growth.
*China's population control. They're still limited to one child per family, from what I know of. Also, in China, many families are having selective abortions in order to produce male children, so there's already a lot of men without wives there, and that number will keep going up. Less females being born= less children that can be born in later generations.
*In Africa, AIDS is jumping up pretty quickly, even with a ton of prevention plans and safe-sex campaigns, the same thing with Southeast Asia, in places like Thailand, Cambodia, those areas. AIDS has been fought hard, but it still does shorten lives and kill people, and so there's going to be large numbers of AIDS-related deaths in the next 50 years, probably in the tens of millions, and that's no exaggeration.
*In developed countries like the U.S., and Western Europe, there's actually zero population growth, or even a decline in population and this trend seems like it will continue for some time, which other countries will also pick up as they become modernized.
So yeah, the population may increase for a while still, but eventually it'll stabilize or even shrink some, so it's not much to worry about....if you live in a modern country.
|
|
Shippo
Guest Super Poster
[A:0]Princess
Woooo!!
Posts: 1,593
|
Post by Shippo on Sept 5, 2009 5:03:46 GMT -5
The end of the world is coming in 2012, so who bothers? Just have to get by these few years and then its all over. Only 2 years left. I think we can manage with 6.5 billion ppl these last 2 yrs It isnt going to end in 2012. Please give me some real proof of why u think this..
|
|
|
Post by किक प& on Sept 5, 2009 8:51:41 GMT -5
|
|
ΩÑÇ ±Ñêÿø±
Inactive Member
NC Gentleman
Posts: 1,177
|
Post by ΩÑÇ ±Ñêÿø± on Sept 5, 2009 9:14:03 GMT -5
Decemeber 21,2012....hmmmwe will see
|
|
BløøKïd
NC Recruit
DMG's Bebe!
Posts: 463
|
Post by BløøKïd on Sept 6, 2009 16:53:06 GMT -5
Deforestation wouldn't be a problem. Everythin' that is "Huge/Big" in Economy[?] or the country/state itself has usually evolved into Industry. Walls,why? Sooner or later people may adapt there.Such as adpatin' to extreme weather or coldness[Is ther extreme weather of hotness anywhere?] We will adapt but nature won't. Example lets raise the temperature of the world a little bit. The results will be the following more superstorms, higher chance of drought which leads to another list of problems, extinction of species which leads to another list of problems, more deforestation (plants need water too). Yes we can adapt but if nature fails were going down with it. And economy? bloo im not talking financial crisis which were in anyway (recession). The economy has nothing to do with population bro wtf is wrong with you. You have no common sense to add things together man. The bigger areea have already how do you say..Umm.. Found ways 'round it.The area may be all polluted and stuff but they cut down on stuff like that. Replantin' trees 'round the area is what most Areas do. No,iMeant Industry would take over.It would spread out and make mo' modern 1st World : Streets,Cities,Capitals and so on. The Economy does effect the population. If the Economy is bad(like now) not many people will have babies,attempt to save ol' people,less injections/shots for cures/help. Not enough money to survive well enough.
|
|
ΩÑÇ ±Ñêÿø±
Inactive Member
NC Gentleman
Posts: 1,177
|
Post by ΩÑÇ ±Ñêÿø± on Sept 6, 2009 17:58:05 GMT -5
Uh....ppl will have more babies ppl will keep having sex they wouldn't care if they had half a penny to their name they will keep doing it And the shots will still keep coming regardless of ecomony Now the econmony can effect how they find new cures and what not and vacines the auto industry as we seen has been effected And trees take time to grow...and to me they arnt really planting them fast enough For every tree they cut dow they should put 3 -5 up ro make up for the loss >_>
|
|
|
Post by किक प& on Sept 6, 2009 19:09:01 GMT -5
We will adapt but nature won't. Example lets raise the temperature of the world a little bit. The results will be the following more superstorms, higher chance of drought which leads to another list of problems, extinction of species which leads to another list of problems, more deforestation (plants need water too). Yes we can adapt but if nature fails were going down with it. And economy? bloo im not talking financial crisis which were in anyway (recession). The economy has nothing to do with population bro wtf is wrong with you. You have no common sense to add things together man. The bigger areea have already how do you say..Umm.. Found ways 'round it.The area may be all polluted and stuff but they cut down on stuff like that. Replantin' trees 'round the area is what most Areas do. No,iMeant Industry would take over.It would spread out and make mo' modern 1st World : Streets,Cities,Capitals and so on. The Economy does effect the population. If the Economy is bad(like now) not many people will have babies,attempt to save ol' people,less injections/shots for cures/help. Not enough money to survive well enough. Well since the underage preggo is the highest its ever been, your quotes are proven wrong. thankyou
|
|
|
Post by Finz on Sept 7, 2009 13:14:46 GMT -5
You know, lets pretend this is a movie. Where would this disaster happen?
right, America.
so i be thinking of you ppl, XD
|
|
|
Post by किक प& on Sept 7, 2009 15:29:27 GMT -5
You know, lets pretend this is a movie. Where would this disaster happen? right, America. so i be thinking of you ppl, XD That would be a really unlogical movie. Since overpopulation is a wordly event.
|
|
ΩÑÇ ±Ñêÿø±
Inactive Member
NC Gentleman
Posts: 1,177
|
Post by ΩÑÇ ±Ñêÿø± on Sept 7, 2009 21:54:34 GMT -5
Yea......what if we just got rid of finz that would idk be a good start of bring population down >_>
|
|
|
Post by Finz on Sept 8, 2009 2:06:13 GMT -5
i have doubles, hey pop up when ever the original is harmed, so i could be even in a town near you
|
|
|
Post by किक प& on Sept 8, 2009 4:49:00 GMT -5
i have doubles, hey pop up when ever the original is harmed, so i could be even in a town near you Reason 4 over-pop
|
|
|
Post by Hunter™ on Sept 8, 2009 9:12:39 GMT -5
finz u fool!
you have doomed us all.
|
|
ΩÑÇ ±Ñêÿø±
Inactive Member
NC Gentleman
Posts: 1,177
|
Post by ΩÑÇ ±Ñêÿø± on Sept 8, 2009 12:52:41 GMT -5
I highly doubt u would be in a suit >_>
|
|
|
Post by Wicked×ÑÇ on Sept 13, 2009 14:04:11 GMT -5
Rofl the swine flu should help the matter no? xD
|
|
|
Post by किक प& on Sept 15, 2009 9:01:38 GMT -5
swine flu is a joke. The regular flu kills more people a year then what the swine does.
|
|
|
Post by PASTRY on Sept 15, 2009 19:46:40 GMT -5
I think that it should be illegal to have more than 1 kid, for some time. China is the most populated (i think) so crowded. They should just make it illegal and that would solve the problem.
|
|
|
Post by किक प& on Sept 19, 2009 9:12:22 GMT -5
I think that it should be illegal to have more than 1 kid, for some time. China is the most populated (i think) so crowded. They should just make it illegal and that would solve the problem. Ummm, pao china had that law for sometime now... And America can't do it because people would revolt. And were not a flat our communism yet so.
|
|
|
Post by Hunter™ on Sept 19, 2009 19:28:43 GMT -5
exactly....if America just went from a free democratic country to a country lead by a dictator(s)...not even the people who follow that dictator would listen to him..so it would be billions against one....
|
|